Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between good responders and poor responders in univariate manner

From: Characteristics and surgical outcomes of pediatric traumatic macular holes

Variables

Good responders (n = 22)

Poor responders (n = 37)

P

OR

95% CI

Age (years)

12.3 ± 2.3

12.0 ± 1.9

0.708

1.059

0.789 ~ 1.422

Gender (male/female)

18/4

29/8

0.620

1.450

0.326 ~ 6.526

Laterality (right eye/left eye)

13/19

17/20

0.669

0.773

0.237 ~ 2.521

Time interval (months, median (range))

3.5 (0.5–24)

6 (0.3–48)

0.376

1.038

0.914 ~ 1.178

Etiology (blunt trauma/laser injury)

11/11

28/9

0.025

0.240

0.066 ~ 0.866

Preoperative BCVA (logMAR)

0.84 ± 0.29

1.10 ± 0.43

0.029

0.134

0.020 ~ 0.919

MD (µm)

401.3 ± 99.7

682.6 ± 238.2

< 0.001

0.606

0.442 ~ 0.832

BD (µm)

909.9 ± 269.2

1313.7 ± 518.0

0.007

0.828

0.715 ~ 0.958

Preoperative EZ defect (µm)

1034.9 ± 262.1

1667.7 ± 709.3

0.002

0.834

0.730 ~ 0.952

Retinal thickness at hole margin (µm)

323.2 ± 19.8

323.7 ± 49.4

0.976

0.985

0.368 ~ 2.637

Eccentricity

0.38 ± 0.22

0.46 ± 0.18

0.302

0.112

0.002 ~ 6.654

Postoperative EZ defect at 6 months (µm)

144.8 ± 221.3

531.4 ± 399.3

0.007

0.778

0.627 ~ 0.966

Postoperative fovea thickness at 6 months (µm)

117.3 ± 27.1

80.6 ± 23.5

0.002

28.743

1.616 ~ 511.105

  1. Time interval, time from injury to surgery; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; Good responders (final BCVA ≥ 20/40); Poor responders (final BCVA < 20/40); MD, minimal diameter; BD, basal diameter; EZ, ellipsoid zone