Table 2 Comparison between patients treated with inverted ILM flap technique and patients treated with ILM peeling alone
From: Characteristics and surgical outcomes of pediatric traumatic macular holes
Variables | Inverted ILM flap (n = 22) | ILM peeling alone (n = 37) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 12.2 ± 2.3 | 12.3 ± 2.2 | 0.929 |
Gender (male/female) | 18/4 | 30/7 | 0.944 |
Laterality (right eye/left eye) | 11/11 | 11/26 | 0.119 |
Time interval (months, median (range)) | 12 (0.5–48) | 4 (0.3–24) | 0.009 |
Etiology (blunt trauma/laser injury) | 18/4 | 25/12 | 0.234 |
Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) | 1.23 ± 0.42 | 0.91 ± 0.36 | 0.003 |
MD (µm) | 650.2 ± 242.1 | 510.4 ± 206.7 | 0.003 |
BD (µm) | 1226.6 ± 355.2 | 1067.6 ± 481.1 | 0.228 |
Preoperative EZ defect (µm) | 1516.3 ± 540.7 | 1290.9 ± 642.9 | 0.222 |
Retinal thickness at hole margin (µm) | 317.6 ± 38.6 | 328.1 ± 37.4 | 0.429 |
Eccentricity | 0.43 ± 0.21 | 0.40 ± 0.17 | 0.601 |
MH closed (yes/no) | 21/1 | 32/5 | 0.511 |
Final BCVA (logMAR) | 0.61 ± 0.36 | 0.50 ± 0.40 | 0.322 |
Postoperative EZ defect at 6 months (µm) | 381.0 ± 309.3 | 241.9 ± 392.5 | 0.279 |
Postoperative fovea thickness at 6 months (µm) | 89.9 ± 31.7 | 110.2 ± 29.4 | 0.075 |