Effect of repeated Low-Level red light therapy on axial length in myopic individuals: predictors for a good response

Table 2 Summary of results at one-year follow-up

Variables	poor responders’ group				good responders’ group				P
	baseline	1 year	p	1-year changes	baseline	1 year	p	1-year changes
SER (D)	-2.62 ± 1.80	-3.12 ± 1.80	< 0.001	-0.50 ± 0.28	-4.15 ± 2.87	-3.61 ± 2.70	< 0.001	0.54 ± 0.36	< 0.001
AL (mm)	24.15 ± 0.99	24.38 ± 0.99	< 0.001	0.23 ± 0.12	24.76 ± 1.21	24.47 ± 1.15	< 0.001	-0.29 ± 0.16	< 0.001
ACC (D)	43.79 ± 1.49	43.61 ± 1.49	< 0.001	-0.17 ± 0.20	43.85 ± 1.29	43.65 ± 1.33	< 0.001	-0.19 ± 0.22	0.909
CT (µm)	247.02 ± 28.06	261.54 ± 28.40	< 0.001	14.20 ± 2.94	242.02 ± 28.13	263.93 ± 28.02	< 0.001	21.90 ± 4.50	< 0.001

SER: Spherical Equivalent Refraction, AL: Axial Length, ACC: Average corneal curvature, CT: Choroidal Thickness
P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test for paired samples and unpaired samples, respectively. Statistical significance was defined at the 0.05 level, with significant differences indicated in bold (P-value < 0.05)

ISSN: 1471-2415