Skip to main content

Table 19 Comparison of topographical areas

From: From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre

Author

Rohrbach et al. [16]

Spraul and Grossniklaus [17]

Current study

Region

Tübingen

Atlanta

Freiburg

Time period

1900

1920

1940

1960

1980

1990

1941–1995

1945–2015

Number

n = 98

n = 87

n = 239

n = 230

n = 656

n = 525

n = 24,444

n = 39,256

Eyelid

5%

17%

12%

34%

29%

45%

8%

50%

Cornea

0%

1%

3%

16%

23%

22%

37%

16%

Conjunctiva

3%

1%

4%

12%

10%

16%

7%

14%

Eyeball

51%

69%

37%

24%

20%

9%

1)

9.1%

Temporal artery

2)

2)

2)

2)

2)

2)

2)

3.9%

Orbit

1%

0%

3%

3%

1%

1%

2%

1.4%

Lens

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

15%

0.9%

Vitreous

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

11%

0.5%

Retina

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

7%

0.3%

Choroidea

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

3)

9%

0.1%

Other location

38% 4)

11% 4)

40% 4)

10% 4)

18% 4)

8% 4)

3%

3.5% 5)

  1. Relative frequencies of specimens from various topographical areas during the observation period (1945–2015) and comparison with one other study. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding
  2. 1) Eyeballs were not evaluated as a single location; individual diagnoses were assigned to the respective localisations (cornea, lens, vitreous, retina, choroidea) [17]
  3. 2) Included in “other location” [16, 17]
  4. 3) Not specified separately
  5. 4) Includes intraocular tissue (1900: 16%, 1920: 3%, 1940: 21%, 1960: 4%, 1980: 13%, 1990: 4%), lacrimal duct (1900: 8%, 1920: 6%, 1940: 14%, 1960: 1%, 1980: 1%, 1990: 1%), temporal artery biopsies, gangliectomies (1900) and other unclassifiable and lost tissue samples (1900: 15%, 1920: 2%, 1940: 5%, 1960: 5%, 1980: 4%, 1990: 3%) [16]
  6. 5) Does not include orbit, lens, vitreous, retina, choroidea